Newsgroups: alt.support.diet.rx
Path:
Supernews69!Supernews60!feta.direct.ca!newsfeed.direct.ca!howland.erols.net!ix
.
netcom.com!marya
From: marya@netcom.com (wide-eyed wanderer)
Subject: Re: Obenix and Bontril (phendimetrazine)
Message-ID: 
Organization: Netcom Online Communications Services (408-241-9760 login: 
guest)
References: 

Date: Tue, 9 Sep 1997 23:49:42 GMT
Lines: 33
Sender: marya@netcom6.netcom.com
Xref: Supernews69 alt.support.diet.rx:8593
In article  jetsilverx@aol.com
(JetsilverX) writes:
>
>>Every time a person who is not morbidly obese takes these drugs they 
>>threaten my right to access. Why is that okay, but it's not okay for me 
>>to say the drugs should be restricted? Why are your rights more important 
>>than mine?
>
>This should be so simple, even you should be able to understand it. My
>rights are the same as your rights. If I want the drugs, I should be able
>to take them. If you want the drugs, you should be able to take them. What
>could be more equal than that?
>
>I know you think the sun  rises and sets up your ass, right next to your
>head, but that is not the way it is. My desire is as imortant to me as
>yours is you. Why should your rights be more imortant than mine?
>
I do believe that my medical rights are more important that your 
cosmetic rights. And if the abuse of cosmetic rights threaten ANYONE'S 
medical rights I think the cosmetic rights should be taken away.
But, hey, what that hell is this "rights" business 
anyway-- I hear heroin is great for weight loss. Why don't you fuss 
because they've taken away your right to take heroin? Or cancer meds-- 
they've taken away that right of yours too. The nerve.
- Marya
>
>
>Jet Silverman 
>
>to email me, remove the "X"
.
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/Wildcat5! v2.0
---------------