Hi folks, this message came through OK, so whatever the problem
was, it went away.  I notice 3:632/348 is still running RtMail 1.10,
so I guess that means that it isn't a problem with it per se.
BFN.  Paul.


On 1995-11-28 09:02, mark lewis of 1:3634/12 wrote:

ml> see what happens with this one... i feed from 1:170/400 ... he's the
ml> Z1EC, BTW...

ml> )\/(ark

ml> ---
ml> {at}Via MsgTrack 1:3634/12, Tue Nov 28 1995 at 14:06 UTC
ml> {at}Via MsgTrack++ 1:170/400{at}fidonet, Wed Nov 29 1995 at 03:35 UTC
ml> {at}Via 1:170/400{at}fidonet {at}19951128.213601 FE.ABS 1.42.bF ABC00109
ml> {at}Via RTrk 3:670/301{at}fidonet, Nov 29 1995 at 23:08
ml> {at}Via 3:670/301 {at}19951129.230859 GEcho 1.11+
ml> {at}Via RTrk 3:632/998{at}fidonet, Nov 30 1995 at 02:48
ml> {at}Via 3:632/998 {at}19951130.024907 GEcho/386 1.11+
ml> {at}Via 3:632/348{at}fidonet {at}19951130.160018 RtMail 1.10
ml> {at}Via Squish/386 1.11 3:711/809, Sat Dec 02 1995 at 03:06 UTC
ml> {at}Via Tobruk 0.32, 3:711/934.0 1995-12-02 05:55:13
@EOT:

---