>RK>Actually you made a statement - This is the original message!!
 >   [....]
 >RK>this..."training". --- >
 >This message I sent you, which was rather low brow, was not actually
Actually you sent it to Cloyce Osborn and then I butted in ...  ...
 >intended to be sent.  I practice the technique of writing some rather,
 >um, harsh words if I'm irked.  Then erasing them and getting down to
 >writing what I actually send, which usually isn't at vitriolic.  Last
 >week, I managed to send out a mail packet which still contained the
 >harsh messages.  One of those was towards you.  I appologize.
Accepted ...
 >About the above.  I left out things, and misremembered including them in
 >the original words.  Undoubtably, that is what I said.  I did truthfully
 >hear it on the news coming in to work that morning.  And had heard
 >nothing else other then some commentary about this not being the first
 >time this had occured.  I'm pretty sure I've heard some further talk
 >about it by some of the concervative talk show hosts on radio, but very
 >little.  As well as the posted article in here by the Washington Times.
 >I missremembered telling you how I had come to acqure the news story.
Well being of this area and having witnesses several of these practice 
session first hand ... they are not what they may sound like when the story 
is repeated by some of the talk news shows. It is very harmless and very 
professional, IMHO the way in which they conduct these practice sessions and 
the care with which they use noone or anything without permission. Of course 
they don't announce these -training sessions- on the radio or TV, can can you 
imagine the number of people that would show up just to watch. I would even 
be tempted to get in the way just to watch. 
--- SLMAIL v4.5a  (#2948)
(1:237/546)
---------------