Hi Thom,

     Me too i'll make this formal request that you intervene in whatever
manner you deem appropriate to curtail the character assassination aimed
at myself being posted here by Charles Angelich and his supporters, lets
add to this the assassination of my topics - and of this echo itself!...

                                   :(

     While you're at it, please urge those users to respect constructive
efforts made here when they got none of their own to make or they simply
are opposed to it.  Topic obstructivism or steering is easy while trying
to find alternatives isn't...  These quotes should make you foresee why:

          "Some more constructivism", May 27, 2002:
________________________________________________________________________
CA> MSKermit connects directly to the DOS packet drivers EPPPD or LSPPP
CA> and does not require RLFossil, TCPPORT, or INT14.  This is wrong.
MS> On the contrary, THIS IS RIGHT!  My proof is quite simple to grasp:
MS> ...
MS>  ~TelNet~ client is `MS-Kermit v3.16 BETA 12 NASA' with its Class-1/
MS>  ~EtherNet~ direct packet-driver interface.  Test connection is with
MS>  Sailor.Lib.MD.US in all cases, with a same .INI configuration file.
MS>
MS>  DOS ~PPP~ packet-driver:    Loaded in pure     Loaded in a `Win 95'
MS>  `EPPPD v0.6 BETA'           `MS-DOS v7.010':   DOS-box:
MS>
MS>  .ZIP-file transfer rate:    3529 cps           3220 cps
MS>  `Kermit' packet-size is
MS>   optimal at 1536 bytes.
MS>
MS>
MS>  ~TelNet~ client is still `MS-Kermit v3.16 BETA 12 NASA' but using a
MS>  ~FOSSIL~ interface locked at 115K2 bps (created by `COM/IP v3.00').
MS>                               ^^^^^^^^^
MS>  `Windows' ~PPP~ packet-driver:                 Loaded in a `Win 95'
MS>  `WinSock v2'                                   DOS-box:
MS>
MS>  .ZIP-file transfer rate:                       3235 cps
MS>  `Kermit' packet-size could
MS>   be adjusted all the way
MS>   up to 9024 bytes.  Nice!
MS>
MS>  The usefullness of the ~FOSSIL~ interface is fully demonstrated...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

     "What's worth my time.", June 4, 2002:
________________________________________________________________________
MS> The DOS INet users would be better with an `RLFossil' replacement
MS> but that doesn't mean you can't make it usefull at all...  Thanks to
MS> `RLFossil', i could transfer files using ~TelNet~/`ZMoDem' for
MS> months now;  performance depends on the selected BBS...
MS> ...
MS> ************************[ My record starts during the fall of 2001]*
MS> BBS:                      `ZMoDem' Receive:       `ZMoDem' Send:
MS>                           Size/Files/Errors/      Size/Files/Errors/
MS>                            cps                     cps
MS>
MS> fame.darktech.org         415 K  12   0 1857        18 K  4  0 1643
MS>                           767 K   5   9 1443
MS> runekeep.darktech.org     1M091   4  13 1487       153 K  3 14  685
MS> chowdanet.com             1M473  37   0 2077        76 K 19  0 1240
MS>                           2M003  13  30 1528
MS> juge.com                  1M007  28   0 1643        32 K  9  0 1702
MS>                           914 K   5  19 1320
MS> juxtaposition.dynip.com    64 K   2   0 2332       1M146  4  0 1874
MS>                           1M509  10  42 1354       142 K  1  6  542
MS> bbs.sursum-corda.com      285 K   4   0 1617         2 K  1  0 1377
MS>                           156 K   3   5 1102
MS> online.tkdsoftware.com    2M430  21   0 2022        26 K 10  0 1017
MS>                           2M103   8 110 1189
MS> telnet.fidotel.com        620 K   3   0 1854       286 K  1  0 2311
MS>                           378 K   2  22 1018
MS> bbsnets.com               7M029 195   0 1634       1M119 77  0 1105
MS>                           2M561  40 218  896
MS> ...
MS> Anyway, i tried to invest some of my time on propoting `Kermit' too
MS> and that's what i get on carbbs.ca:  so far, my DownLoads rate at
MS> 2K4/4K2 cps depending on the interface used (`RLFossil' vs internal
MS> Class-1/~EtherNet~) and my UpLoads reach 3K cps;  at the moment, the
MS> direct Class-1/~EtherNet~ fails for UpLoads but we're working...  I
MS> recommend `RLFossil'+`MS-Kermit Medium v3.15'...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
     This persistance of Charles Angelich at ignoring results previously
published can't be justified rationally, nor his abuse of ~WEB~ media or
of this echo!  I'm convinced the contrast between the data above and the
vague coulourful statements made recently is quite obvious;  i find hard
enough to have to do this alone, any "politic" content is excess load!!!

                                  8-7

     Nowhere i went i've been free to discuss legitimate content without
having my topics spoiled during the last couple years;  it would be nice
to be able to publish results or propose challenges and not get insulted
when all other means have been used and it only failed to scare me away.

                                         Salutations,  

                                         Michel Samson
                                         a/s Bicephale
                                         http://www.iquebec.com/dos-inet
                                         (to be accessed by humans only)


... Using `MS-DOS v7.10a'+`LSPPP v0.8'+`RLFossil v1.2'+`{Commo} v7.7'...
--- MultiMail/XT v0.42 -  Numbers will make BBSing UNIVERSAL, not sugar!