| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | proposed new nodelist [2] |
FV>> It appears that before a new format for the Fidonet FV>> Nodelist can be made, the current flags and format FV>> needs to be decided on. With at least two Zone having FV>> different rules for what is allowed in the Nodelist, FV>> we have a problem that needs to be dealt with. :( ml>> that is true... one ~must~, however, also be aware ml>> that technicians should be the ones to perform this ml>> function and not politicos... why? most politicos ml>> aren't "into" "technical"... they don't fully ml>> understand the technical aspects... they are wrapped ml>> up in debate, emotion, and secondary representation... FV> An example is in the FIDOPOLS echo. :-) I agree. Technical FV> first, politics as a last AND needed alternative. ummm... drop that "AMD needed alternative" portion and i'll wholeheartedly agree with you... it is all too obvious to those that want to see it that the politicos are where the "blame" lays for much of the demise of ~this~ network... they are the ones that brought us P4 and others... )\/(ark* Origin: (1:3634/12) SEEN-BY: 106/2000 200/0 201/100 148 200 209 300 329 400 505 600 203/600 SEEN-BY: 204/450 700 205/0 206/0 490/21 633/267 270 @PATH: 3634/12 106/2000 201/505 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.