JN> They mentioned an old, old section of the original 1930's
 JN> communitions act and  failed to quote the ECPA.
 SC> Is that because they expect the ECPA to eventually be overturned?
> I should hope so, and return some of the freedoms Americans
> once enjoyed.
Perhaps they know that the ECPA has little to do with the fact
that people listen to stuff on their scanners.  Maybe "not enforced"
will come before "overturned".
Probably will not be overturned for a few years, as that would be
like saying "hey, we passed a stupid law that cannot be enforced."
--- PCBoard (R) v15.3/M 2
---------------