RB> From: "Robert Bononno" 

 RB> You mean it does it on a daily basis? And then they have to
 RB> manually delist you? But my question is, how does this work?
 RB> Does the *recipient* ISP have to sign up with SpamCop?

yes... it is for protection from inbound spam... this way, providers can
set their SMTP server to just drop the connection before receiving the spam
and loosing that bandwidth...

)\/(ark

 RB> I see
 RB> how this could be a potential *&^$!{at}#  nightmare for
 RB> legitimate e-mail (like mine). I read the listing history but
 RB> wasn't quite sure what to make of it.


 RB> Geo.  wrote in message
 RB> news:3df9240e$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>> the server you were sending from got blacklisted for spam on the following
>> days:
>>
>> Listing history:
>> listed: Mon Dec 9 04:31:02 2002 GMT Sunday, December 08, 2002 11:31:02
>> PM -0500
>> delisted: Mon Dec 9 04:59:03 2002 GMT Sunday, December 08, 2002 11:59:03
>> PM -0500
>> listed: Mon Dec 9 05:05:02 2002 GMT Monday, December 09, 2002 12:05:02
>> AM -0500
>> delisted: Wed Dec 11 00:22:02 2002 GMT Tuesday, December 10, 2002 7:22:02
>> PM -0500
>>
>> You can view the entire history here along with headers from the reported
>> spams http://spamcop.net/w3m?action=checkblock&ip=207.172.4.62
>>
>> Geo.
>>
>>
>> "Robert Bononno"  wrote in message
>> news:3df8c166{at}w3.nls.net...
>> Can anyone tell me why this outgoing message is being blocked. The blocked
>> address is part of the RCN IP block and RCN is *my* ISP. I've been sending
>> message to this address for over a year, suddenly I get this nonsense. I
>> sent a message to Erols (RCN) and they simply repeated the
obvious: "the
>> message is being blocked because of spam issues." Huh?
Spamcop says that
>> this address block is not being blocked, however (at least that appears to
>> be the case if I'm reading their message correctly).
>>
>>

 RB> --- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-4
 RB> (1:379/1.45)