Hello James!
Thursday October 02 1997 18:00, James Vahn wrote to Ted Rolle:
j
 >> At the risk of tilting at windmills, would the compression/ASCII
 >> armor feature of PGP be acceptable?  This part of PGP does not use
 >> encryption, so anyone would be able to read the messages.
 JV> You're tilting.  ;-)  These encoded messages are just a small part of
 JV> the traffic here and I'd just as soon stick to tools that can be
 JV> easily had. Not exactly a bad idea, but....no.
Absolutely the last post from me on this subject.  Honest.
The reason I suggested PGP is that it is dependable.  I've had 
less-than-phenomenal success with all of the varieties of UUE that abound.  
If there is a "standard" version, I'd like to get it and then shut up. ;->
Ted
SMTP: troll@synthcom.com
:          Key fingerprint =  72 62 FB B9 04 73 49 2A  3B 20 A2 EE B6 38 59 

--- GEcho 1.11+
---------------