| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Multi-byte character sets |
-=> Quoting Simon Avery to Goran Eriksson <=- SA> Goran Eriksson on 05 Feb 00 in NET_DEV SA> Hello Goran GE> What multi-byte character sets are currently used in ftn messages? GE> With multi-byte character sets I mean character sets where one GE> character is encoded into more than one byte. SA> Cyrillic, Chinese and Hebrew AFAIK - and I've no idea of the SA> implementation of those, or even if they're true multi-byte or simply SA> extended codepages. Why would Cyrillic be using multibyte character sets? Even when you include the characters used in only some Slavic languages, there's nowhere near 256 characters. It fits just fine into the upper 128 in both KOI-8, and ISO 8859 Cyrillic. Ditto for Hebrew. The only languages that use multi-byte characters sets *at all* are Chinese, Japanese, and Korean. Or at least those are the only ones I've ever heard of. I suspect that you are confusing "non-Latin-1 8-bit character sets" which still use *single* bytes for characters, but just describe them differently than Latin-1, with *16-bit* character sets where it takes 2 bytes to specify *one* character. Those are needed for ideographic languages because of the *thousands* of characters involved. --- FMailX 1.48a* Origin: Shadowshack (1:105/51) SEEN-BY: 201/0 200 209 300 329 400 407 411 505 600 203/600 204/450 700 205/0 SEEN-BY: 206/0 396/1 490/21 633/267 270 @PATH: 105/50 360 72 396/1 201/505 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.