Seanette Blaylock wrote in a message to Mark Fornoff:
 MF> Just a thought here, Robert.  Is Justin really showing a contempt for
 MF> Constitutional authority?  I'm not sure, but it could be a way to
 MF> force Congress to act w/o endless committees and commissions that
 MF> spend money and accomplish nothing useful.  If (the proposed action)
 MF> is the right thing to do, that kind of circumvention doesn't sound so
 MF> bad. -- Mark
 SB> [suspicious look] Who are you and what have you done with the REAL
 SB> Mark Fornoff, the guy who respects the law of the land?
 SB> Circumventing the Constitution "doesn't sound so bad"?
Relax, it's really me.  I was attempting to stimulate discussion by posing a 
possible alternative meaning to what Justin is saying.  I disagree with the 
basic concept of their entire case.   I think the AsG had the right to sue 
the tobacco companies, but I will *never* believe that anyone should be even 
*contemplating* circumventing the Constitution. Further, if it can be proven 
that the action they took does that, and is legal under current law, that it 
is a loophole which should be closed as rapidly as possible.
-- Mark
--- FMailX32 1.22
---------------