"Ed Hulett -> Ross Sauer"  wrote in
news:9565$HOLYSMOKE{at}JamNNTPd:

 RS>> Once again, sails miles over your pointy little head.

 EH> Not in the least.

 RS>> This is a group that considers themselves to be "true
 EH>   Christians."

 EH> Hatred is *NOT* part of Christ's teachings, so their claim is moot.

That's odd, because Jesus condemned an entire city.

 RS>> Hence their condemning as "cults" anyone else, Catholics,
 EH>   Mormons, etc.

 EH> So what? They can have their beliefs. There is no law against
 EH> differing beliefs.

I know.

 RS>> So who decides, which group is a "true Christian" and who is a
 EH>   "false RS> Christian?"

 EH> By their fruits you shall know them.

 RS>> Who decides what is valid, and what is not?

 EH> By their fruits you shall know them.

Apples or oranges?

 RS>> The only obvious answer is it is a personal decision.

 EH> No, it is not.

So someone else has to make the decisions?

 RS>> That's why Mohammed (if he existed) has just as much validity as
 EH>   Joseph RS> Smith.

 EH> Only to those who don't have a clue.

 RS>> To claim otherwise shows religious bigotry, nothing more,
 EH>   nothing less.

 EH> Religious bigotry is posted by you and your ilk on a regular basis.

 EH> You don't get to say what is or is not valid. You can wallow in your
 EH> ignorance.

Thanks for showing everyone what a "my religion can do no wrong" fundy
bigot you are.

--- Xnews/5.04.25