From: "Rich" 

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_004D_01C2A1F2.69BDA8F0
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

   WinSock version 2.0 extended the WinSock standard to support plugable =
service providers.  This means that ISVs can extend or otherwise muck =
with your sockets without replacing the sockets DLL.  I believe you can =
see if you have WinSock 2.0 by looking for WS2_32.DLL.

   If you have static DNS, instead of trying PING, try NSLOOKUP.  Use =
"set debug" and "set d2" to see the raw requests and responses.

Rich

  "Jeff Shultz"  wrote in message =
news:3df8fea9$1{at}w3.nls.net...
  Rich wrote:
  >    With WinSock 2.0 it is possible to insert into the sockets layer=20
  > without replacing the system DLLs.  I don't remember whether or not=20
  > Windows 98 has WinSock 2.0.
  > =20
  I don't even understand the above statement...

  >    Did you check the TCP/IP settings to make sure that a static DNS =
was=20
  > not registered?  I think it is possible to have a static DNS even if =

  > DHCP is used.

  Actually I do have static DNS... and static IP as well. That's how we=20
  configure DSL here.


  I'm guessing that the system is fragged and he's going to get to=20
  reinstall it. That will keep him from running SpyNuker again.

------=_NextPart_000_004D_01C2A1F2.69BDA8F0
Content-Type: text/html;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable








   WinSock
version 2.0 =
extended the=20
WinSock standard to support plugable service providers.  This
means = that=20
ISVs can extend or otherwise muck with your sockets without replacing = the=20
sockets DLL.  I believe you can see if you have WinSock 2.0 by =
looking for=20
WS2_32.DLL.
 
   If you
have static DNS, =
instead of=20
trying PING, try NSLOOKUP.  Use "set debug" and
"set d2" to see the = raw=20
requests and responses.
 
Rich
 

  "Jeff Shultz" <jeffshul{at}wvi.com>">mailto:jeffshul{at}wvi.com">jeffshul{at}wvi.com>
wrote in =
message news:3df8fea9$1{at}w3.nls.net...Rich=20
  wrote:>    With WinSock 2.0
it is possible to =
insert=20
  into the sockets layer > without replacing the system =
DLLs.  I=20
  don't remember whether or not > Windows 98 has WinSock=20
  2.0.>  I don't even understand the above=20
  statement...>   
Did you check the TCP/IP =
settings=20
  to make sure that a static DNS was > not registered?  I =
think it=20
  is possible to have a static DNS even if > DHCP is=20
  used.Actually I do have static DNS... and static IP as well. =
That's=20
  how we configure DSL here.I'm
guessing that the system =
is=20
  fragged and he's going to get to reinstall it. That will keep him =
from=20
  running SpyNuker again.

------=_NextPart_000_004D_01C2A1F2.69BDA8F0--

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-4