| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: Nodelist-Flags |
Hello Michiel! On 06 Nov 99 wrote Michiel van der Vlist to Leonard Erickson About "Nodelist-Flags": MvdV> Why am I making a point of this? To show that an upper limit MvdV> must be specified, otherwise you will run into the the problem MvdV> demmonstrared: a programmer not aware of possibilities MvdV> elsewhere, will assume that xxx is enough and reserve so many MvdV> bytes for the value and the software will break if someone MvdV> else assumes someting different. Within a short time you will then discover that the upper limit is too low and there are problems again. To make it clear, two months ago I needed to write support in a mailer setup program for serial ports upto 4mbit baudrate. You mention 128 kb over ISDN, this is without datacompression, do we need a new baudrate field if we start transfering data at aprox. 400 kb with compression over ISDN. In my optinion we only need capability flags. Lets stop the baudrate bidding at the point were we are now. Youre right with this point, the baudrate field belongs to ancient modems that needed it. Gtx, Michiel --- LXPoint 1.4.02 (FEddy)* Origin: MBSE BBS for Linux development (2:2801/16.1) SEEN-BY: 201/0 200 209 300 329 400 407 411 505 600 203/600 204/450 700 205/0 SEEN-BY: 206/0 270/101 490/21 633/267 270 @PATH: 2801/16 1008 500/9 3 396/1 270/101 201/505 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.