RC> JB>>> Does this mean a tagline cannot include an exact quote from an
RC> JB>>> echo participant, even if it is lifted word for word and a
RC> JB>>> copy of the original post is available as evidence ?

RC> RC>> That is correct..

RC> RC>> To allow exception only opens pandoras box and encourages
RC> RC>> retribution.

RC> JB> Ok but I can repost a quote that was originally posted here,
RC> JB> even if a few months old, if it is topical to the conversation ?
RC> JB> Since I archive things over a year, this would not be a problem
RC> JB> for me.

RC>To remind someone of what they said on a position, yes..

RC>To repeatedly bludgeon them over the head with it, no.

RC>Explaination:

RC>If they ignore you, fail to retract or explain their change in
RC>position after a limited amount of reminders, chances are they arent
RC>going to. Therefore repeated quotes could be construed as disruptive
RC>to the echo.

RC>These quotes cannot have been originally from this echoes older days.

Ok.  This seems reasonable.  I suspect the response will be all three of 
the above since that seems to be their tactic regardless of the age of 
the original post.


Jeff

CMPQwk 1.42-21 9999 
Democrats --  The party of economic slavery ....

--- PCBoard (R) v15.3/M 10