On 12-26-97 William Elliot wrote to Clarence Hogan... 
 
        Hello William, 
 WE> JB> As I said before, yes.  However, I went on to say, it is  
 WE> JB> -not necessary- for us to know "evil."  All we have to  
 WE> JB> know is "good."  Anything not good is therefore evil.  
    
 WE> WE> Anybody that is not white is black. 
 
 WE> CH> And which little devil told you that lie?  :) 
 
 WE> JB. 
   
  The part you are missing, given the premise either good or 
evil and not good leaves us with evil. 
  However, as I pointed out to you before and Clarence, 
one, can't use such arguments to distinguish -between- 
non-classes when such classes are more than one. 
    In the example you gave, you made a statement to 
distinguish amoung non-white which as I wrote previously 
is ILLOGICAL as it contains more than one.  
 
Take care, 
John 
 
___ 
 * OFFLINE 1.54 
--- Maximus 3.01
---------------