DC> DC> JB> If you have one, present it and we'll see about getting it
DC> DC> JB> paid. Until  then, when you are dealing with absolutes,
DC> DC> JB> then it only takes one  instances for the tautology to be
DC> DC> JB> proven false. I am wondering if you  will see the additional
DC> DC> JB> irony of this. 

DC> DC>The irony, Jeff, has already been written by you.  You are asking
DC> DC>for evidence of its existance. 

DC> JB> No, you cannot read English again.  I did not ask for any
DC> JB> evidence.  I only said that if you produce it then we'll talk
DC> JB> about getting it paid.  Please ensure you quote my words
DC> JB> accurately.

DC>ROTFLMAO!  

DC>Do you really think that to "produce it" isn't asking for evidence?  

You truly are illiterate.  I did not say "produce it".  I said
"If you 
produce it".  Thus I am not asking for it to be produced.  I only stated 
that if that option happens, we can discuss the next steps.  It is 
amazing what lengths you will go to in order to prove just how 
illiterate you really are.  You ignored the remainder of the discussion 
which is all about me not believing you, which is the centerpiece of 
your argument.  


Jeff

CMPQwk 1.42-21 9999 
Democrats --  The party of death ......

--- PCBoard (R) v15.3/M 10