- 
->  DC> JB> You truly are illiterate.  I did not say "produce
it".  I said
->  DC> JB> "If you produce it".  Thus I am not asking
for it to be
-> 
->  DC>Do you really think that your attempt at such an evasion fools
anyone
->  DC>other  than stupid fundys like you?

Well, I may disagree with Jeff on politics, and may on some religious
issues, but I think you should recognize this: Jeff is very clear and very
precise with his choice of words; a virtue you should emulate.  
-> 
->  JB> Your other co-moderator needs to get you under control.  You can't
->  JB> read  you twist words, you lie continuously and then you flaunt
your
But other than that, Dan, you're doing fine...(Or will, when you get a clue
and take your meds) and...
  
-> Twist words?  You don't even know what you fucking wrote.
If you, by using that level of language, fear that someone will think you
impressive, or fearsomely emphatic or whatever...you are mistaken. On the
other hand if you are seeking to avoid that impression...you are doing
well.
  
 
-> you ignorant son of a bitch. 
Now, describe yourself. In your own mind. The opposite? A knowledgeable man
of good family? If so, do you believe that you are slumming? Can it be
possible that you do not care what anyone else here thinks about anything?
Are you trying to convince or teach or explain anything to anyone here? If
so how successful have you been so far?
I think that there is a burgeoning movement beginning in the United States 
of evangelism of many flavors...This might be a good place to discuss that.  
I've read that there are in the United States over 20,000 Christian
denominations! 20.000! 20,001 if you count mine...hey, mine is not not
Christian...
What would YOU like to happen in HS?
  



  You stated it right above there
-> when you wrote. "If you produce it".  That's asking for me to provide
the 
-> evidence for you, you moron.

Man! You are missing some pretty basic English here.
...uh..."Please produce it. I want you to produce it." These request.
"If you produce it" Is a conjecture based on a future act. It is not a
request. Throwing around the word moron in this context, really does call
into question your level of ability to read with comprehension. Lashing out
is a form of defense, I guess. Or something. "Meds and a clue. coming
up!".     
 
-> 
-> You were asked to prove a negative and you can't do it, can you. You 
-> need me to do your work for.  

And you don't really read your text after you type it. 
Touch-typing can lead you into a false sense of confidence :-)
->
Now you stoop to idiocy...
 
-> Now, pay up on the promissory note with a cashier's check and I'll 
-> restore your faith when I have the check in hand.  Or, you can take 
-> the other route and simply admit that you can't prove a negative.

4,500,000 hits on "proving a negative" on Google.

We went into that a year ago...you didn't bother to learn _anything_?
  
-> 
-> Which one for you?

Get me a grown up.
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5