-> On 26 Apr 09  16:23:00, Jeff Binkley got back to Dan Ceppa 
-> Re: A fundy pail full of shit

 DC> DC> JB> said "If you produce it".  Thus I am not
asking for it to be
 
 DC> DC>Do you really think that your attempt at such an evasion fools
 DC> DC>anyone other  than stupid fundys like you?  
 
 DC> JB> Your other co-moderator needs to get you under control.  You
 DC> JB> can't read  you twist words, you lie continuously and then you
 DC> JB> flaunt your
 
 DC>Twist words?  You don't even know what you fucking wrote.  

 JB> I know exactly what I wrote.  

Like hell you do.  You know you can't produce the evidence.  That's why 
you made than lame attempt to pawn you role off on me.  It's not 
working. Your "logic" isn't. 
 
 DC> JB> I have asked for no evidence.  I need none.  I don't care if you
 DC>have
 
 DC>Yes you did, you ignorant son of a bitch.  You stated it right above
 DC>there when you wrote. "If you produce it".  That's asking for me to
 DC>provide the  evidence for you, you moron.  

 JB> No, it is not asking you to produce anything.  Are you that incapable
 JB> of grasping basic words in the English language ?  I believe so.  I

Then, Jeff, as you did not prove I don't have the document, pay up.  

 JB> made a  conditional statement.  I made no mention of my preference for
 JB> the  outcome of the condition.  A big time scientists such as yourself
 JB> should understand this basic logical construct.  

LOL!  You still don't have a fucking clue, Jeff.  

 JB> Let me make this extremely simple for you.  I don't care whether you 
 JB> produce the note or not.
 
 DC>You were asked to prove a negative and you can't do it, can you. You 
 DC>need me to do your work for.  

 JB> I didn't indicate I was going to try and prove one for you.  That 
 JB> historically has proven a waste of my time, so I am not stupid enough
 JB> to attempt to going forward.  

LOL!  Of course it's a waste of your time.  You didn't accomplish it 
then.  You haven't accomplished it now.  

 
 DC>Now, pay up on the promissory note with a cashier's check and I'll 
 DC>restore your faith when I have the check in hand.  Or, you can take 
 DC>the other route and simply admit that you can't prove a negative.  
 
 DC>Which one for you?  

 JB> Since you appear both illiterate and have an extremely short memory, I
 JB> will state my response yet again.  I believe this is the fourth time. 
 JB> If you produce the note we can talk about the next steps.  

There you go again, making a fool of yourself. 

 JB> When you are dealing with absolutes, then it only takes one instance
 JB> for the tautology to be proven false.

Provide the evidence I don't have the document, Jeff.  That's all you 
gotta do.  

Now, be the coward you are and run away again.  


... Jeff Binkley's Brain is 100% Teflon. Nothing sticks to it.
--- OMX/Blue Wave/DOS v2.30