Received: from saf.tzo.com ([140.239.225.181])
 by fanciful.org (wcSMTP v5.6.450.3)
 with SMTP id 598970062; Sat, 15 Feb 2003 22:09:59 -0800
Received: from 216.174.194.62 by saf.tzo.com
 id 2003021601112592189 for photo{at}fanciful.org;
 Sun, 16 Feb 2003 06:11:25 GMT
Received: (qmail 20152 invoked from network); 16 Feb 2003 06:09:46 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO BananaNose) (64.42.61.152)
  by queue.atgi.net with SMTP; 16 Feb 2003 06:09:46 -0000
Message-ID: 
From: "Carl Cook" 
To: 
References: 

Subject: Re: 50-500mm Sigma Lens
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 22:09:45 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000


>
> We asked him what he planned to use it for. We tried to explain that long
> lenses were difficult to use and limited in utility. He seemed quite
> defensive in his replies. Eventually he got the money together and bought
> something in the 400mm - 600mm range. A few days later, he was back on
line
> in a rage.>
> We reminded him of the past discussions, and made suggestions on how to
use
> this thing. I would guess he saw himself swaggering in front of the dumb
> photographers with their little lenses and bowing in awe to him - who
knows?
>
Ah, the classic Christmas card photo of the naked photographer with the
camera with long lens hanging in front of him.


>He pretty much faded out about that time.
>

No doubt Ms HotBabe found out the lens was but a ruse!

--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5