| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: OS/400 and shared library hell |
From: "Ronnie T. Mungo, Boy Genius"
"Robert Comer" wrote in message
news:3dfe2c9c{at}w3.nls.net...
> Like I said, never seen one do that. Probably a different business
sector.
> They aren't overwriting something in QSYS are they? If so I'd REALLY
> complain loudly and so should IBM.
>
Ummmm..... One stop complaining...
> > The point is that it is not a situation unique to Microsoft, nor IBM,
and
> > the slings and arrows thrown at MS are not necessarily fully fair.
>
> MS has the biggest problem and they are the biggest target by their market
> share, so it most definitely *is* fair. Heck, I wouldn't complain as much
> if it were as easy to fix such problems in Windows as it is on the 400.
And an elephant is the biggest target if you want tot hrow darts in the
jungle. The point wasn't target size.
RTM, BG
--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-4
* Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/1.45)SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 379/1 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.