| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Off the shoulder chip |
>> given up on >> hearing 'aids' (there has to be a better more apt name >> for those >> things...) > BM> That's all they are. > Some folks seem to see them as 'cures' ... So they would seem to the others until each discovers, one way or another, that they're not. > BM> The TTY numbers that I call from my computer in hyperterminal mode > BM> function like online chat, so there's no operator at all, just me on > BM> my keyboard and the callee on his. That works all right, AFAIC. > Really? NO Operator in betweeN???? Well then! ha! You should be able to try this out for yourself by calling any business that advertises a TTY number. > That means the > hearies in my life have no excuse wrt 'talking through > a operator." > the only PROBLEM is.. if you're going to call them > don't they have to > be online too? hmm. Yes, they have to have some kind of setup; I don't know whether it necessarily constitutes "being online," but they need a setup that will ring or otherwise signal to them if you call, so they can then answer. One of the sites mentioned when researching the phone for work was www.harriscomm.com/catalog/ and another was www.hearmore.com; maybe they have descriptions of what is available. > When I first used a tty it was via the computer but > the operartor > typed back to me what the other person said on their > phone. Maybe some business do it that way; I've only run into the ones that are like an online chat on both sides, with no intervening operator. > What I like about the tty phone is at least they get > to hear your > voice. My sister likes that (and hates to type btw.). > BM> At work, they spoke of getting a device that would display text on my > BM> end, and I could speak to the other person, presumably, although here > BM> an operator was required to type the other person's message to me. > Nod. That is what I had before I got the tty voice > over phone. Well, I'm not at all familiar with any of this stuff; I thought that WAS a voice carry over. > ........... >> Can you help it though? THEY put it there. The ones >> who refuse to meet >> us half way with our efforts to ease communication >> with them. I think not. Bright inventors came up with these potentially useful ideas which would be a boon to those who need them. Those who won't have anything to do with it don't want it there, if they are expected to use it once in a while. >> Perhaps the better thing to do is to communicate the >> way you are able >> with those willing and write off the rest who are too >> self centered to >> even try. > BM> Sometimes you don't have a choice. > True. The biggest complaint is 'the operator keeps > asking me to talk > slower. Well I can understand that. I talk too fast > too. Back when I > used the puter tty set up I sometimes chatted with the > op (not suppsed > to but anyway... I had been asking for information so > it was okay)... > one op told me some people expect you to know how to > spell their names > if they're giving a name and get mad if you ask them > to please spell i > tout... so they can type it. I can't understand people > getting mad at > the ops.. they provide a virtually free service after > all. It's free to you, maybe, but not to those people. After all, they have to speak slowly and *spell*--like young schoolchildren, for heaven's sake. ---* Origin: T E X A S ! (1:382/48) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 5030/786 @PATH: 382/48 3613/1275 123/500 106/2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.