ml> no i didn't... the placement of the comma sets it off from that section
ml> i am commenting about... reread it like this...

ml>   it is suggested , but that [new] programs always generate
ml>   one.

An English sentence like that, with two parts to it, must be able to
be broken down into two individual statements.

You are suggesting that one of the statements is:

New programs always generate one.

Now I ask, generate one what?

The true statement is:

It is suggested that new programs always generate a tearline.

At least, that's my understanding.

Anyway, what I did was swap the two around.  I'd be interested to see
what your alternative interpretation of this is...

It is suggested that new programs always generate a tearline,
but accept a message with or without one.  


BFN.  Paul.
@EOT:

---