JHM>
   > >MB> As JdeBP is so fond of pointing out, the C++ standard is a moving
   > >MB> target.
   >
   > True enough, but I think that certain things should be in
   > 10.5. RTTI for example, its been 'finalized' for quite some
   > time.
JHM>

  Watcom has a publically stated policy of *not* including new language
  features from the committee drafts of the ISO C++ Standard in its C++
  compiler. IBM has said things to the same effect about Visual Age C++.

  It's Borland and MetaWare who have attempted to implement many of the
  new features in the drafts, such as RTTI, in their C++ compilers.

  Of course, the consequence of that is that (for example) Borland C++
  1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 are all subtly incompatible, and it is quite
  difficult to write C++ code that works on all three compilers.

  > JdeBP <
___
 X MegaMail 2.10 #0:

--- Maximus/2 3.00