-=> ED HULETT wrote to WAYNE CHIRNSIDE <=-

 EH> WAYNE CHIRNSIDE -> ED HULETT wrote:
 -=>> ED HULETT wrote to ROSS SAUER <=-

 EH>> Ross Sauer -> Stan Hardegree wrote:
 RS>> "Stan Hardegree -> All"  wrote in
 RS>> news:14412$POL_DISORDER{at}JamNNTPd:

 SH>>> Today, Obama attached to legislation a signing statement so brazen in
 SH>>> its hypocrisy that democrats in Congress are bitching about it.
 SH>>> Listening to the moonbats here and in the other echoes, when GW
 WC> issued
 SH>>> a signing statement, it had the effect of nullifying the Constitution
 SH>>> (this was particularly true of the criminal Chirnside and the
 SH>>> illiterate Ceppa.  Otto Archie has no idea what a signing statement
 SH>>> is).  Everyone seems to be quiet about the Obama statement, though.

 RS>> Just what was this signing statememnt?

 EH>> It was exactly the same thing Bush's signing statement was.

 WC> President Obama's signing statement ( 1 of 6) was the same thing as
 WC> President Bush's 1,200 signing statements!!!

 EH> Obama has only been in office for 6 months.

 WC> George W. Bush personally wrote some 1,200 signing statements
 WC> signifying that he would elect to ignore various laws passed by
 WC> Congress.

 EH> That's exactly what Obama has put in his signing statements.

 WC> It is NOT the within the Executive branch's authority to make
 WC> or break the laws passed by Congress.


Oh, now I figure I know what your talking about, the F-22 pork package 
attached to health care legislation.

You do realise the cold war is over right?
You are aware the F-22 is a plane without a mission right?
You're certaibly aware it costs 44,000 dollars per hour
in the air toi operate right?

I presume you're also aware that the F-22 required THIRTY HOURS
of ground maintanance per hours flight time right?


 EH>> No, what figures is that you and all the other moonbats whined on and
 EH>> on about Bush usurping the Constitution with his signing statement and
 EH>> then not utter a single word about Obama doing the exact same thing.

 WC> What thing?

 EH> Obama is unwilling to abide by the amendments Congress likes to attach
 EH> to essential bills.

F-22 essential?
It's pork pure and simple.


 WC> What was the nature of Obama's signing statement?

 EH> Read about it, moron.

I just did.

 WC> What makes you think I'd be any less likely to criticize his?

 EH> I wasn't talking about or to you, moron.

 WC> George W. Bush's record on signinng statements amounts to more
 WC> of them than all previous President's signing statements
 WC> combined, times 2.

 EH> There is nothing wrong with signing statements. If Bush had indeed
 EH> signed that many, I highly doubt they were all as bad as you moonbats
 EH> think they were.

Yeah, of what importance is the United States Constitution, Geneva accords.
U.N. Charter, anti-ballistic missle treaty, Nuremberg proticols or lifting the 
ban on sensitive military application nuclear knowledge and material support
to India which just happens to be a non-signatory to the anti-nuclear arms
proliferation accords?

... He does the work of 3 Men...Moe, Larry & Curly
--- MultiMail/Linux v0.49