| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: Fmail, HPT and FastEcho |
Hi mark, On 22 Nov 16 20:10, mark lewis wrote to Wilfred van Velzen: about: "Fmail, HPT and FastEcho": RM>>> If it is written with portability in mind, it should be OK. WV>> If they are both linux gnu c, what can be different between the two? ml> path separators and drive letters... We are talking about linux on x86 vs arm. I'm not aware that linux on arm uses different path separators or drive letters! ;) Wilfred. --- FMail-W32 1.73.4.41-B20161120* Origin: point{at}work (2:280/464.112) SEEN-BY: 103/705 154/10 203/0 227/51 230/0 240/5832 249/303 261/38 280/464 SEEN-BY: 280/5003 5555 292/624 854 423/120 633/0 267 280 281 412 640/384 SEEN-BY: 712/848 770/1 2320/100 5075/35 @PATH: 280/464 712/848 633/280 267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.