Hej Seva og alt det d‚r ...
KL>> Why ? I guess it is the slippm.exe that has some kind of
KL>> limitation. I use SIO drivers, and I lock the com port 3 at 115200
KL>> (it has a 16550 UART) with su 3 lock 115200.
SM> 1. You should not "lock" DTE with SU.EXE - Let your comm. application do
SM> the "locking" job.
If I don't, none of the mentioned programs yield more than 3600 CPS.
SM> 2. It is your Internet feed provider that is responsible for the lower
SM> performance, not PPP.EXE (slippm.exe is _not_ a driver, it is a launcher
SM> for PPP).
He is not OS/2 minded, at directs all errors to my operating system with the
words "change to WIN 95". I don't want DOS 8.01 ... However, even local
files from his system are transferred with maximum 3600 CPS. He also has a
BBS, and there I always get appr 7500 CPS, OS/2 or "clean" DOS.
KL>> Are there specific OS/2 drivers for the Zyxel OMNI ? The disk that
KL>> came with has only 2864 drivers - and for DOS 8.0
KL>> deldeldeldeldeldeldel Win 95.
SM> There are a couple CAPI OS/2 drivers available, check 2:236/438.
Will Do. Though I did find Zyxel's site, and they said it was still doing
final testing ...
SM> - Origin: Russian_on_Noerrebro'nx (2:235/206)
Swiss-Dane_in_Rodovre !
K†re - lohse@danbbs.dk http://www.danbbs.dk/~lohse
--- Terminate 3.00/Pro
---------------
* Origin: *My* lawyer can beat *your* lawyer ! (2:236/600.22)
|