| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Laugh of the week |
-EG> Greg was waived by Sparky Anderson and then ranted: -EG> GC> Players have been traded between games of a doubleheader, but -EG> GC> I've never known of players playing for both sides in a suspended -EG> GC> game. -EG> I believe that it has happened and that it may be that I -EG> remember it from the minors. -EG> --- TrekEd 1.00 -EG> (1:170/1701) A letter is on its way to MLB asking for a rules interpretation on this. Also, I have asked the question regarding the catcher's balk that came up -- The question I asked Rule 4.03(a) says - "Some have told me that the 'catcher's balk' rule only applies when an intentional walk is being given, and the catcher steps out of the box. I thought I saw a catcher's balk called int he late 1970s in a Red Sox game in which the catcher left the box without the ball so as to fool a baserunner or bluff him back. Is any violation of position without the ball a catcher's balk, or only a balk during an intentional walk situation? The rule is vague on this, but MLB should know." MLB is very good, albeit slow, in answering inquiries like this. --- ----------------EG> * Origin: Marge Schott, the cure for Baseball Fever * Origin: Computer Castle / 20 Lines / Newton, NH / 603-382-0338 (1:324/127) |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via exec-pc | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.