WAYNE CHIRNSIDE -> ED HULETT wrote:
 -=>> ED HULETT wrote to WAYNE CHIRNSIDE <=-

 EH>> WAYNE CHIRNSIDE -> ED HULETT wrote:
 -=>>> ED HULETT wrote to ROSS SAUER <=-

 EH>>> Ross Sauer -> Stan Hardegree wrote:
 RS>>> "Stan Hardegree -> All"  wrote in
 RS>>> news:14412$POL_DISORDER{at}JamNNTPd:

 SH>>>> Today, Obama attached to legislation a signing statement so
 WC> brazen in
 SH>>>> its hypocrisy that democrats in Congress are bitching about it.
 SH>>>> Listening to the moonbats here and in the other echoes, when GW
 WC>> issued
 SH>>>> a signing statement, it had the effect of nullifying the
 WC> Constitution
 SH>>>> (this was particularly true of the criminal Chirnside and the
 SH>>>> illiterate Ceppa.  Otto Archie has no idea what a
signing statement
 SH>>>> is).  Everyone seems to be quiet about the Obama
statement, though.

 RS>>> Just what was this signing statememnt?

 EH>>> It was exactly the same thing Bush's signing statement was.

 WC>> President Obama's signing statement ( 1 of 6) was the same thing as
 WC>> President Bush's 1,200 signing statements!!!

 EH>> Obama has only been in office for 6 months.

 WC>> George W. Bush personally wrote some 1,200 signing statements
 WC>> signifying that he would elect to ignore various laws passed by
 WC>> Congress.

 EH>> That's exactly what Obama has put in his signing statements.

 WC>> It is NOT the within the Executive branch's authority to make
 WC>> or break the laws passed by Congress.


 WC> Oh, now I figure I know what your talking about, the F-22 pork package
 WC> attached to health care legislation.

Oh, so it was military pork stuck to health care pork.

 WC> You do realise the cold war is over right?

Yes.

 WC> You are aware the F-22 is a plane without a mission right?

That's what Obama and the media want you to think.

 WC> You're certaibly aware it costs 44,000 dollars per hour
 WC> in the air toi operate right?

And just how much did Obama's little photo-op fly-by in New York cost?

 WC> I presume you're also aware that the F-22 required THIRTY HOURS
 WC> of ground maintanance per hours flight time right?

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!


So, all this to defend BHO's signing statement?

 EH>>> No, what figures is that you and all the other moonbats whined on and
 EH>>> on about Bush usurping the Constitution with his signing statement
 WC> and
 EH>>> then not utter a single word about Obama doing the exact same thing.

 WC>> What thing?

 EH>> Obama is unwilling to abide by the amendments Congress likes to attach
 EH>> to essential bills.

 WC> F-22 essential?

Read my sentence again. I said nothing about the amendment being essential.

 WC> It's pork pure and simple.

Everything that comes out of DC is pork pure and simple.


 WC>> What was the nature of Obama's signing statement?

 EH>> Read about it, moron.

 WC> I just did.

You didn't read enough.

 WC>> What makes you think I'd be any less likely to criticize his?

 EH>> I wasn't talking about or to you, moron.

 WC>> George W. Bush's record on signinng statements amounts to more
 WC>> of them than all previous President's signing statements
 WC>> combined, times 2.

 EH>> There is nothing wrong with signing statements. If Bush had indeed
 EH>> signed that many, I highly doubt they were all as bad as you moonbats
 EH>> think they were.

 WC> Yeah, of what importance is the United States Constitution, Geneva accords.

Here you go again...

 WC> U.N. Charter, anti-ballistic missle treaty, Nuremberg proticols or
lifting the
 WC> ban on sensitive military application nuclear knowledge and material support
 WC> to India which just happens to be a non-signatory to the anti-nuclear arms
 WC> proliferation accords?

Ho hum...

Ed

-- 
"The ultimate result of shielding men from the effects of folly is
to fill the world with fools." --Herbert Spencer

"The principle of spending money to be paid by posterity, under
the name of funding, is but swindling futurity on a large scale."
 --Thomas Jefferson

Linux User# 416016
Linux Machine# 379711

--- Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090608)