From: Mike '/m' 


On Sat, 4 Jan 2003 10:13:37 -0600, "Randy H"
 wrote:

>As Ultrabac lost my potential business the success (or failure)
>of their product restoting my files isn't an issue.

Yup.


>
>This also points to a much more glaring problem with Microsoft's
>Architectural integrity-more specifically, the lack thereof.

Yup.  Yup.

 /m


>
>"Mike '/m'"  wrote in message
>news:tpld1vgpqpm2vvobffm854sno22otoqviu{at}4ax.com...
>>
>> Hopefully they are more fastidious regarding the complete restoration
>> of your files.  ;-)
>>
>>  /m
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 3 Jan 2003 22:50:49 -0600, "Randy H"
>>  wrote:
>>
>> >Regardless, I find the lack of thoroughness of Ultrabac's uninstall to
>> >not remove everythinng a very poor showing.
>> >
>> >"Ned F. Reiter"  wrote in message
>> >news:3e159554{at}w3.nls.net...
>> >> Randy,
>> >>
>> >> Probably the scheduler.
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> -- Ned --
>> >> nreiter_AT_attglobal_DOT_net
>> >> Association of Shareware Professionals developer member
>> >> http://www.asp-shareware.org/
>> >>
>> >> "Randy H" 
wrote in message
>> >> news:3e14fea9{at}w3.nls.net...
>> >> > I found that Ultrabac doesn't clean up after itself during an
>uninstall.
>> >> > I found a service that Ultrabac installed and I had
to manually
>> >> > remove it.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-4