Hola Nikhil.
Nikhil Shringarpurey le mandą a Lars Wigrell:
NS> Surprisingly, this is one of the reasons I use UltraCompressor Pro R3.
NS> It checks for common sections not only in the same file but between
NS> files as well!  So while zipping 2 copies of command.com (~30,000
NS> bytes) will yield an archive of ~40 Kb, UC2R3 yields a 15-20 Kb
NS> archive.  It is slower, but until Jung figures out to do that, it'll
NS> always make UC2 superior.
To be precise, it would be fair to say that Rar will beat Uc2proR3 on almost 
any practical situation. What makes Uc2proR3 much better than Rar is that at 
the expense of size (compared with rar) it can compress/decompress/update 
solid archives ASTRONOMICALLY FASTER than rar. Also notice that uc2 can keep 
versions of files.
avalloud@dc.uba.ar.
SqR!.
---
---------------