Hello Dale!

On Wednesday December 06 2006 00:00, you wrote to me:

 MVDV>> No, the message was about the fidonews editor missing in
 MVDV>> action. Just as the  subject line said. I mentioned that
 MVDV>> missing ZC merely as an example of people applying double
 MVDV>> standards. Here is that message from sept 20th:

 DS>    In other words, you dug up that old issue which (in your opinion)
 DS>    is not yet settled.   Your contribution to that thread was entirely
 DS>    about the Z6 "problem", only slightly veiled.

I did not even mention Z6.

 MVDV>> It has, as that was the missing FidoNwes editor was the
 MVDV>> issue in the message of sept 20th. The message that Carol
 MVDV>> dug up.

 DS>    It may have been the issue in previous messages in the thread until
 DS>    you dug up the Z6 issue once again.

I dod not dug up the Z6 issue once again. I merely metioned the lack of
response when a ZC was MIA for ove a year.

 MVDV>> Only as an example of people applying double standards. It
 MVDV>> was still about the FidoNews editor missing in action.

 DS>   What you said had nothing to do with Fidonews editor.  It had to do
 DS>   with your perception of errors in the Z6 nodelist.

No, it had to to with the hypocracy of reaction to a missing fidonews
editor vs the lack of reaction to a missing ZC. And the 'missing ZC' was
brought up by Ward btw, not by me.

 MVDV>> It was Carol who asked if I still objected to Bin Li's
 MVDV>> listing. It was Carol who raised *that* issue again.

 DS>   How can you blame xxCarol for responding to your resurfacing the
 DS>   charge that you keep making about her zone.

I am not blaming anyone. It is you that is blaiming me. To that I object.

 DS>   Accept that you are the one who brought it up, not her.

No, I will not accept that.


Cheers, Michiel

--- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20060315