MvdV>> Q.E.D. is what is tradionally written at the end of a
 MvdV>> mathematical proof. So what have you proven? I see no proof above
 MvdV>> the Q.E.D.

 RN> I offered no proof.  I merely put `Q.E.D' and its description as a means
 RN> of showing you how it is understood here.

   Meaning that you picked up a posh statement that you didn't understand
at all, just because it seemed like a hefty thing to do?

   Obviously you didn't study Latin at school or else you would understand
what Quod Erat Demonstrandum meant. Please remember that many of us
European old-timers *DID* study Latin...

---