| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Pricks Part 1 - The saga begins |
From: "Brenton" Reply-To: Brenton , Fidonet AVtech Echo The Manager, Fonebiz 320 Princes Highway, Rockdale, NSW 2216 John, On the 7th of April 2003, I brought my Nokia 8250 phone to your company to have a fault repaired. As required, I completed your "request for service form", and duly ticked the box which bore the closest resemblance to the problem I was experiencing, which was that the speaker would intermittently cut-out whilst I was making calls, resulting in my inability to hear the other party. As the check-box does not provide much details for the technician, I made some additional notes regarding the intermittent nature of the problem. When handing over the phone, your representative informed me that the repair charge could be as high as $100-, and that a service fee would apply if I chose to not proceed with the repair. I accepted the terms as offered at the time. When I was quoted $93.50 for the repair, I asked your company to proceed, and repair the phone. On the 9th of April, I picked-up my phone, paid the $93.50 repair fee, and took my family on holiday. After collecting my phone, I noticed that the contrast on the LCD module was not correct, and on the same day, I had the original problem again. The speaker would intermittently cut-out during a conversation. I was not able to return to Rockdale until 13 days later, being the 22nd of April. Once again, I completed your "request for service form", and attempted to highlight the fact that the fault was exactly the same as previously reported, with the addition of the LCD contrast problem which was introduced whilst your technicians were attempting to affect the previous repair. My phone was with your organisation for a further 8 days, and was picked up on the 30th of April. By the end of the day, I was once again experiencing the exact same fault, whereby the speaker would intermittently cut out during a call. I was no able to return the phone until about the 12th of May, when it was brought in for the third time. Once again, I completed your request for service form, and attempted to explain the problem with as much detail as possible. I took every step to ensure that your customer service representative who booked the job in, understood that this was the third time the phone was being returned for the same fault, and that there was sufficient information for your technician to know exactly what the fault was. On the 22nd of May, I received your SMS informing me that there was to be a $165- fee to repair my phone. I contacted your office immediately, and it was then that you informed me that the $165- was for a replacement phone, and you made your offer to credit the $93.50, I had previously paid if I were to accept this charge. I informed you that this was not acceptable, and requested a full refund and the return of my phone. You then informed me that you would remove the modules you had put into my phone, and provide me with a refund. However, when I attended your premises today to collect my phone and refund, you then informed me that you were going to charge me a fee of approximately $50- for not accepting your quotation. John, I have a serious problem with this, for a few reasons. Firstly, when my phone was originally brought in for repair, I was told that the fee could be as much as $100- and if I were to not proceed there would be a quotation fee. I accepted this, and agreed to proceed with your quotation of $93.50. I was NOT told that the fee could be as high as $165-, and might involve the complete replacement of the unit. Had I been informed of this at the time of the first visit, I would not have left the phone with Fonebiz, and pursued other options. Secondly, as the problem with the phone, is still the exact same fault which was reported when the phone was first sent in to be repaired, and I have paid Fonebiz $93.50 to repair the unit, I feel that Fonebiz should honour it's obligation to warrant the work performed. At this point, I find your decision to attempt to charge me your $50- rejected quotation fee, simply abhorrent. Furthermore, your statement that you will remove the modules you have put into the phone, is also quite concerning. Your technicians have obviously exchanged modules in the phone which were not faulty, and I would now question the quality of the modules which you intend to replace these with. In short, there was nothing wrong with the modules when they were removed by your technicians, and I would demand that the modules in the phone when I pick it up, also be 100% functional. In summary, I feel that there is only one of two ways for this matter to proceed. My preferred option, would be for Fonebiz to honour it's workmanship warranty, and repair the phone under the terms of this warranty. Alternatively, my phone should be returned to me in the exact same condition, and with the same physical modules installed as it was when last returned to Fonebiz, with the same fault, and no other faults, and a full refund made of the $93.50 which has been paid. As this series of events has now dragged out for over 7 weeks, your prompt attention to this matter would be appreciated. I can be contacted on 02-1234-2202 Yours Sincerely, Brenton Vettoretti --- ifmail v.2.15* Origin: VideoCam Services WEB(http://vcsweb.com/) (3:800/221{at}fidonet) SEEN-BY: 633/104 260 262 267 270 285 640/296 305 531 954 1674 690/682 712/848 SEEN-BY: 713/615 774/605 800/1 7 221 846 @PATH: 800/221 1 640/954 633/260 267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.