Hello Roger!

On Monday December 04 2006 11:31, you wrote to me:

 >> RN> I see you're still putting your unnecessary copyright notice at
 >> RN> the end.

 >> It is not your article and you are not the editor of the Snooze. The
 >> necessity is not for you to judge.

 RN> I am expressing an opinion.  Is that not allowed?

Of course you are allowed to express an opinion. In case this was merely an
opinion I say: you are entitled to your opinion.

 >> RN>   Why are you doing that?

 >> I for once thought Roy Witt had a good idea when he suggested it.
 >> This after some Z1 folks challenged my copyright.

 RN> Q.E.D.

Quod Erat Demonstrantum what? What does it demonstrate?

 >> RN> If I were to submit an article for the snooze, I definitely
 >> RN> would not  require that notice.

 >> When was the last time you submitted an article for the Snooze?

 RN> I don't remember if I ever did, but that's besides the point.

The point is that you are talking hypothetics.

 >> I wrote the article, the copyright is mine. I have every right to
 >> add a copyright notice. I will continue to do that. With or without
 >> your approval. Live with it.

 RN> I still think it's silly.

You are entitled to your opinion. Which I am entitled to ignore.


Cheers, Michiel

--- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20060315