Hello Carol!

On Tuesday December 05 2006 01:36, you wrote to me:

 CS>> I also have a very set standard 000- set which Z1 I gather now
 CS>> uses. Michiel is the root of it's development though he was not
 CS>> alone

 MvdV>> Not true either. I *opposed* the use of 000- numbers in the
 MvdV>> nodelist.

 CS> Yes, you always have, but you also pushed for a 'standard'.

Eh? I really think you confuse me with someone else. I never advocated for
anyhing other than having valid dialable telephone numbers or -Unpublished-
in field 6. That is not something I pushed as a standard, it was there long
before I joined FidoNet.

 CS>   Now ya got one.

It is not a standard.

 CS>> and he probably doesnt like the end ramifications.

 MvdV>> Now you make it look as if I end up not liking the result of
 MvdV>> what I st Sorry Carol, but you are WAY off. I have opposed the
 MvdV>> use of 000- numbe (in any form) from the moment Z2 disontinued
 MvdV>> an experiment that made i clear they were a bad idea. That was
 MvdV>> 1994 or 1995. *Years* before you and I ever got in contact.

 CS> Yes, you have been one voice on that for a very long time.  The
 CS> ramifications Ťof your view took turns you did not expect.

I do not accept that what emerged is in any way a "ramification"
of my view.


Cheers, Michiel

--- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20060315