Hello Roger!

On Tuesday December 05 2006 11:40, you wrote to Bj”rn Felten:

 MvdV>>> Q.E.D. is what is tradionally written at the end of a
 MvdV>>> mathematical proof. So what have you proven? I see no proof
 MvdV>>> above the Q.E.D.

 RN>> I offered no proof.  I merely put `Q.E.D' and its description as
 RN>> a means of showing you how it is understood here.

 BF>>    Meaning that you picked up a posh statement that you didn't
 BF>> understand at all, just because it seemed like a hefty thing to
 BF>> do?

 BF>>    Obviously you didn't study Latin at school or else you would
 BF>> understand what Quod Erat Demonstrandum meant. Please remember
 BF>> that many of us European old-timers *DID* study Latin...

 RN> Good for you. (EOT)

Fine with me. EOT it is.

Cheers, Michiel

--- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20060315