From: "Rich" 

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_01D9_01C72926.2520EF80
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

   I made no stupid claims relating to cars.  You did make a stupid =
claim relating to the classic menu.  Support your claim or retract it.

Rich

  "Geo."  wrote in message =
news:4591e1bc$3{at}w3.nls.net...
  If I switch the position of the gas and brake pedals in your car, is =
the car=20
  usable? You answer that then I'll answer your question.

  Geo.

  "Rich"  wrote in message news:4591dfa2{at}w3.nls.net...
     You wrote "turning off the menu bar in IE7 ... I had to turn it =
back on=20
  to make it useable".  I asked "what is present on the classic menus =
that is=20
  not present on the new toolbar menus that is necessary for IE to be =
usable?"=20
  You failed to answer in your reply and I asked again.  And again you =
fail to=20
  answer.  If you lied when you claimed it was necessary to you to make =
it=20
  usable say so otherwise please identify what was missing that made it=20
  unusable.

  Rich

    "Geo."  wrote in message =
news:4591cdd0$1{at}w3.nls.net...
    "Rich"  wrote in message news:458f0097{at}w3.nls.net...
    >>   Regarding IE7, what is present on the classic menus that is not =

  present
    >> on the new toolbar menus that is necessary for IE to be usable?<<

    I'm typing in windows mail, above I see
    file/edit/view/insert/format/tools/message/help. THAT is what is =
missing=20
  in
    IE7. What, didn't the IE7 team synchronize the interface design with =
the
    rest of the Windows teams? I open my computer, I see
    file/edit/view/tools/help, looks familiar, did the IE7 team not =
notice=20
  this?

    According to you everyone but the IE7 team fucked up huh?

    Geo.

------=_NextPart_000_01D9_01C72926.2520EF80
Content-Type: text/html;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable








   I made no
stupid claims =
relating to=20
cars.  You did make a stupid claim relating to the classic =
menu. =20
Support your claim or retract it.
Rich
 

  "Geo." <georger{at}nls.net>">mailto:georger{at}nls.net">georger{at}nls.net>
wrote=20
  in message news:4591e1bc$3{at}w3.nls.net...If I=20
  switch the position of the gas and brake pedals in your car, is the =
car=20
  usable? You answer that then I'll answer your=20
  question.Geo."Rich"
<{at}> wrote in message news:4591dfa2{at}w3.nls.net...&nbs=
p; =20
  You wrote "turning off the menu bar in IE7 ... I had to turn it back =
on to=20
  make it useable".  I asked "what is present on the
classic menus =
that is=20
  not present on the new toolbar menus that is necessary for IE to =
be=20
  usable?" You failed to answer in your reply and I asked =
again.  And=20
  again you fail to answer.  If you lied when you claimed it =
was=20
  necessary to you to make it usable say so otherwise please =
identify what=20
  was missing that made it
unusable.Rich  =
"Geo." <georger{at}nls.net>">mailto:georger{at}nls.net">georger{at}nls.net>
wrote in =
message news:4591cdd0$1{at}w3.nls.net...=
 =20
  "Rich" <{at}> wrote in message news:458f0097{at}w3.nls.net...&nbs=
p;=20
  >>   Regarding IE7, what is present on
the classic =
menus that=20
  is not present  >> on the new
toolbar menus that is =

  necessary for IE to be
usable?<<  I'm typing in =
windows=20
  mail, above I see  =
file/edit/view/insert/format/tools/message/help.=20
  THAT is what is missing in  IE7. What,
didn't the IE7 =
team=20
  synchronize the interface design with the  rest of the =
Windows teams?=20
  I open my computer, I see  file/edit/view/tools/help, looks =
familiar,=20
  did the IE7 team not notice this? 
According to you =
everyone=20
  but the IE7 team fucked up huh? =20
Geo.

------=_NextPart_000_01D9_01C72926.2520EF80--

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5