~>  J>  It is strange to see anyone take David Brock and
~>  J> -> Keith Olbermann as credible sources of political information, the
~>  J> way Sauer -> does.
 
~>  J> It is stranger to have someone off-hand dismiss them.
 
~> Brock was a perfectly credible source when he was part of the right wing
~> machine.  He's considered an apostate by the right wing, now, since he
~> left that fold several years ago.

Brock is a good barometer to use on people.  I thought he was a whiny
little jerk who had no journalistic credibility back when he was attacking
Anita Hill, and I pretty much ignored his Clinton stories in 1993 and 1994
unless there was some outside corroboration.  When he said he had been
lying for money, that should have sealed off any future credibility right
there.  But some people liked him back then and hate him now, while others
hated him back then and like him now, solely because of their political bias.

 
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5a