-=> ED HULETT wrote to BOB KLAHN <=-

I am thinking if Mulett great thinker he imagine himself to be
he might have altered the subject line quite some time ago.

I finding this quite amusing. 

I am thinking now Ed with have epiphany and alter suject line soon
having had his very first _original thought_.

Or so he will delude himself.

I could be wrong however.

 EH> Bob Klahn -> John Massey wrote:

 BK>  ...

 JM>>>> To bad for you that Bush is not a criminal.

Having passed The Military Commissions Act of 2006.
The World Court at the Hague is not bound by The Military 
Commissions act of  2006.

Oops, forget who posting to.

 BK>>>  Only if he is ignorant of what his people did.

 BK>>>  Which is too bad for all of us.

 BK>>>  BTW, whether he is a criminal or not would be determined by the
 BK>>>  trial. The only question is if there is sufficient reason to
 BK>>>  believe he is a criminal. The basic standard for indictment.

 JM>> To bad for you that none of the Democrats have the balls to
 JM>> try and indite him.

 BK>  Too bad for the nation. Though I believe they will go at it with
 BK>  the old go along to get along philosophy. Bad for the nation.

 EH> Only an idiot would make such a claim.

 JM>> Guess they know they don't have a case.

 BK>  Yeah, they do. Only they are afraid of the political fallout.

 EH> What "political falout?" If Bush is as hated as you
idiots claim, there
 EH> wouldn't be any "political fallout."
 EH> If there is a case, why doesn't someone pursue it?

Case has to be presented before The World Court at The Hague.

I'm seeing evidence of back stage dealing in American poliotics
perhaps to limit damage.

I'm thinking no limiting damage this one.
I could be wrong on both counts. 

... It is the best of all possible worlds said Dr. Pangloss to Candide
--- MultiMail/Linux v0.47