BV> I'd say so. Shit, here you are writing strategy software for attack
 BV> submarines and they don't even think you can write a copy a-b routine.
 BV> I just hope that I'm not around when our submarine commanders try to
 BV> nuke a bad guy :)
 
BTW, I don't write the submarine software, I just write/maintain
utilities that the developers and others use. 

 PE>> The only "bug", which isn't even a bug, is that I did
assume the
 PE>> packets were valid (ie had x'0000' to terminate them).  And since
 PE>> the packets are coming directly from my system, I'm waiting to see
 PE>> someone try to claim that ludicrosity.

 BV> I had noticed that it was a bit light in the error checking side,
 BV> but then I thought about it for a moment and came to the same
 BV> conclusion that you probably did. If its fucked, its fucked. :)

Yup.  If anyone wants to write a fancy GUI front-end, they should
feel free to do so.  BTW, Frank does have a point about TinyPoint's
use of PKTJOIN.  You're not supposed to go PKTJOIN *.PKT TEMP.PKT,
which apparently the TinyPoint batch files do.  I've asked Dieter
to change that though.  BFN.  Paul.
@EOT:

--- Mksmsg