Michiel van der Vlist wrote in a message to Roger Nelson:

 RN> I am expressing an opinion.  Is that not allowed?

 MvdV> Of course you are allowed to express an opinion. In case this was
 MvdV> merely an opinion I say: you are entitled to your opinion.

It was never anything but.

 >> I for once thought Roy Witt had a good idea when he suggested it.
 >> This after some Z1 folks challenged my copyright.

 RN> Q.E.D.

 MvdV> Quod Erat Demonstrantum what? What does it demonstrate?

Which was to be demonstrated.

 >> RN> If I were to submit an article for the snooze, I definitely
 >> RN> would not  require that notice.

 >> When was the last time you submitted an article for the Snooze?

 RN> I don't remember if I ever did, but that's besides the point.

 MvdV> The point is that you are talking hypothetics.

And you aren't?  Maybe if you posted your reason(s) for your copyright
notice we could better understand.  Here, it is a given that someone's
writings are solely theirs and I can't imagine that anyone would want to
plagiarize yours, let alone anyone else's.

 MvdV> You are entitled to your opinion. Which I am entitled to ignore. 

Good for you!  (-:


Regards,

Roger 
--- timEd/386 1.10.y2k+