Hello Roger!

On Tuesday December 05 2006 07:09, you wrote to me:

 >>> I for once thought Roy Witt had a good idea when he suggested it.
 >>> This after some Z1 folks challenged my copyright.

 RN>> Q.E.D.

 MvdV>> Quod Erat Demonstrantum what? What does it demonstrate?

 RN> Which was to be demonstrated.

Q.E.D. is what is tradionally written at the end of a mathematical proof.
So what have you proven? I see no proof above the Q.E.D.

 >>> RN> If I were to submit an article for the snooze, I definitely
 >>> RN> would not  require that notice.

 >>> When was the last time you submitted an article for the Snooze?

 RN>> I don't remember if I ever did, but that's besides the point.

 MvdV>> The point is that you are talking hypothetics.

 RN> And you aren't?

I submitted articles. You did not.

 RN>   Maybe if you posted your reason(s) for your copyright notice we
 RN> could better understand.

I have already done that after I was challenged the first time. I do not
feel like wasting my time in doing it all over again any time a new player
enters the field.

So more since your mind seems to be set already.


Cheers, Michiel

--- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20060315