Hello Janis.

22 Apr 05 18:16, you wrote to me:

 JK> They sure can when a discussion is twisted by your intimations that
 JK> some "conspiracy" is afoot when that isn't the case at
all. That's the
 JK> first thing.. the second is your actual statement above:

 JK> "Let the people here read the echo for themself (sic)"

 JK> Hmm.. isn't that a bit ridiculous on your part? To tell people here
 JK> that you are NOT going to be accurate in what you say is going on, and
 JK> then tell them to read a resricted zone 1 echo to "see for
 JK> themselves".. THAT is downright rude and obnoxious to boot.

That is my opinion of what I saw.  Nothing more.  My opinions were not
bread to please.  It is your opinion that my opinion is wrong.  When
challenged, I directed people where they might find the data to formulate
their own.  Twenty people can read the same echo and each will walk away
with a different take.

Matt

e-mail: matt [at] thunderdome.us | icq: 16568532 | yahoo: mbedynek

---