Hi,
On 2015-02-25 17:05:31, Michiel van der Vlist wrote to Wilfred van Velzen:
about: "File requesting with binkd":
WV>> We are still discussing the discrepancy between a FTS document and
WV>> current practice.
MvdV> Are we?
That's my perception. ;)
WV>> There isn't fixed anything yet, that might possibly break. ;) You can
WV>> either fix the FTS document, or extend functionality of some mailers.
WV>> I think the consensus is going in the direction of fixing the FTS
WV>> document, and leave the funtionality of the mailers as is...
MvdV> I am not ready to call it consencus. I still think adding "autosendreq"
MvdV> capability to binkd is a usefull extension. Having a *.req initiate a
MvdV> connect all by itself sounds much more logical, given that it already
has
MvdV> the desination in its name just like a *.?ut or *.?lo file.
I agree it's more logical behaviour.
MvdV> I have changed my mind about the default behaviour though. Let
MvdV> autosendreq not be the default. In order not to annoy the
MvdV> conservatives...
You just did! ;)
Bye, Wilfred.
--- FMail-W32-1.69.1.95-B20140716
* Origin: Native IPv6 connectable node (2:280/464)
|