Hi, Rod.

RS>RS> Dunno, something odd is going on here. I have NEVER included a node
RS>RS> number on my AREAFIX messages, coz I assumed that they werent meant
RS>RS> to have one, coz they werent going anywhere. Thats not memory either,
RS>RS> I have check on the old ones. They have always worked too and they
RS>RS> are one of the few netmails where you can be completely sure if the
RS>RS> work or not coz you get a response if they do.

I don't think I have put a To: in my AREAFIXs before, either. I can't
check that, 'cos something in the chain OLX -> QWK2PKT -> PKT2QWK -> OLX
*changes* any To: line in Netmail to From: 3:711/934.24 (my point). And
if it's not there, it *adds* From: :/0.24. So my
copies of all Netmail messages are not as I sent them, and who knows
what went out in the packet.

RS>Frank appeared to be saying that a message to AREAFIX fanged his
RS>arse without a To: field yesterday, so presumably you must have
RS>changed something at your end since ALL of mine worked.

Yep, that's what I was saying. And that to the best of my memory I had
never put a To: into an AREAFIX message before either. And I'm still on
PQWK221. However, it's quite possible I hadn't sent an AREAFIX message
since upgrading (?) from the previous (PQWK220?), so maybe the problem
was introduced there.

Regards, FIM.

 * * You're a legend in your own mind!
@EOT:

---