From: "Randy H" 

They're still playing catch-up, Mike. What Microsoft calls 'new' others
have had for quite a while-it's just new to them, that's all.

Being on the leading edge isn't a Microsoft core competency.


"Mike '/m'"  wrote in message
news:73hu1v4vu2fiqoe4qglkn9gq1cluhi0svf{at}4ax.com...
>
> I see by this thread that the new Microsoft Integrity Prostitute
> Songbook has been issued, coinciding with the recent press releases on
> MS windows media stuff.
>
> I suspect we will be seeing a full-court press my Microosft regarding
> media players for the foreseeable future.   Keep an eye on your
> oxygen-tent controls.
>
>
>  /m
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, 10 Jan 2003 15:23:39 -0000, "Adam Flinton"
>  wrote:
>
> >
> >"Rich"  wrote in message news:3e1e2682{at}w3.nls.net...
> > "  None.  That is why I asked Adam to provide the
information on exactly
> >what he compared.
> >
> >   Low quality is easy.  If you want the smallest size for any format,
pick
> >the lowest bit rate option.  If you don't then size isn't as important to
> >you as other factors."
> >
> >I don't want low quality however filesize is important to me.
> >
> >Adam
> >
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-4