Received: by fanciful.org (Wildcat! SMTP Router v5.6.450.8)
          for photo{at}fanciful.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 05:02:50 -0800
Received: from ns5.tzo.com ([216.55.16.67]) HELO=saf.tzo.com
          by fanciful.org (Wildcat! SMTP v5.6.450.8) with SMTP
          id 424882546; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 05:02:48 -0800
Received: from 205.201.1.216 by saf.tzo.com
 id 2004021108004397651 for photo{at}fanciful.org;
 Wed, 11 Feb 2004 13:00:43 GMT
Received: (qmail 16034 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2004 13:02:42 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO STUARTTURK) (205.201.40.230)
  by speedbuggy.telerama.com with SMTP; 11 Feb 2004 13:02:42 -0000
Message-ID: 
Reply-To: "Stu Turk" 
From: "Stu Turk" 
To: 
References: 

Subject: Re: Kodak processing machine
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 07:03:45 -0500
X-Orig-MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Orig-Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1258"
X-Orig-Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106


----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard Prentiss" 


> This would be the system originally invented by
> Applied Science Fiction, where the film is
> chemically developed (not really dry) to
> total completion, being scanned in IR with
> enough resolution to separate the different
> color layers. Wet processing, but no effluent
> no need for a drain. The negatives are said
> to be totally black, do you still want them?

       I wouldn't want the film after it was process by this machine but if
I shot anything I wanted to keep the negatives of I probably wouldn't go
near this machine.  :-)Most people don't keep their negatives so it probably
doesn't make any difference to them.  But as someone on the list I picked up
that article on pointed out, equipment keeps changing and today's cd-rom
disk may be unprintable due to lack of equipment  some years down the road.
But we can still print negatives shot 50 or more years ago.


--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5