Hello David.

23 May 05 06:33, you wrote to Michiel van der Vlist:

 MvdV>> No need for finger pointing. There is nothing wrong with an NC
 MvdV>> delegating the host function. It is current practise,
 MvdV>> sanctioned by policy and the FTSC.

 DD> Also sanctioned by the Z3C/IC (and currently being recommended by him
 DD> for use in this net).

It would be a good way to eliminate the need for routing charts (here) and
define routing by nodelist.  For example, in net 106, 106/2000 has been the
default route into the net for some time.  It could be feasable for the NC
to list him at /0.  Not going to suggest it as it wouldnt matter much
unless everyone did it but it makes sense.  I read this before but never
gave it much thought until I read this thread.

Matt

e-mail: matt [at] thunderdome.us | icq: 16568532 | yahoo: mbedynek

---