ML> you really need to get your act together in here, hec... those
ML> addresses you point out...

HS>>        201/505
HS>>        201/300
HS>>        203/600

ML> are stripped when the message is tiny-seen-by'd by passing thru the
ML> zonegate from zone 2 to zone 1... if those addresses were to be left in
ML> the SEEN-BY lines, then at least 1:203/600 would never see the
ML> messages... there are nets 203 in both zone 1 and zone 2... that path
ML> line is all zone 2 until it hits 240/99 which is 1:240/99...

Wrong, if you explain that with tiny seen-bys, than the GATING is wrong!!

If that was the case, then atleast 201/205 and 201/300 would not be in the
PATH line.  Sorry.  See my message to Doug for proper tiny seen-by gating
operations.

ML> looks like you need more practise reading/interpreting seen-by and path
ML> lines ...

Looks to me as I kept hanging out in here that MANY of you don't have a
freaking clue of how to engineer and design software!  Or you don't
design software but want to TELL those who do how to freaking do it...
Get out of here...

Mark, do you write a FTN mail tosser and exporter?  How about a mailer,
off-line mail system, sysop editor? AreaFix/File Manager, Tic Processor?
No, well I do and gating is an extremely important concept in Platinum
Xpress.  PX makes life extremely easy with its support for multiple private
networks and its inherent gating logic.  I have been thru the excercise
Mark. You may having a problem with Mikael but if Mikael listen to me, his
software will work better. 
--- Platinum Xpress/386/Wildcat! v1.2g