HS>> There are those who would say that the THREAD LOGIC would be broken
HS>> in the case.  Well, excuse me, no one uses this for threads and more

ml>> it seems that you have totally forgotten about JAM message bases
ml>> and their threading... JAM relys on the MSGID/REPLY control lines to
ml>> link replies of any type to the original...

SW> I find the function in golded or timed to link for subject and not to 
SW> link by MSGID/REPLY as default in JAM.

HS> Thank you.

HS> It takes REAL AUTHORS to understand the issues involved. Not just
HS> people who are just SPEAKING without any direct experience in the
HS> development of electronic mail software.

another cheap shot? you have no idea what i have written/developed or am
writting/developing... your pompous attitude and ego are showing
again...

HS> MSGID/REPLY chaining does not work very well at all.  Results are
HS> BETTER by simply looking at the SUBJECT line (and dates).

BS... refer to my message that discusses JAM linking and what true
threading is all about... the example subject line, "it works!" is a
perfect example of why subject line linking is bogus at best... not to
mention the lazyness of people to not change the subject line when the
thread turns from one subject to another...

)\/(ark